2000 Chrysler Java vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Java would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 2013 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Lotus Evora has automatic transmission and 2000 Chrysler Java has manual transmission. 2000 Chrysler Java will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Lotus Evora will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Java | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
| Model | Java | Evora |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1229 mm |
