2000 Daewoo Lanos vs. 2005 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2005 Ford C-MAX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Lanos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Lanos (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2005 Ford C-MAX. (104 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Lanos should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 339 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Lanos.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford C-MAX (146 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Lanos | 2005 Ford C-MAX | |
| Make | Daewoo | Ford |
| Model | Lanos | C-MAX |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1374 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 55 L |
