2000 Dodge Dakota vs. 2004 Opel Vectra

To start off, 2004 Opel Vectra is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Opel Vectra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Dakota (576 Nm) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Opel Vectra. (265 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Opel Vectra.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Dodge Dakota 2004 Opel Vectra
Make Dodge Opel
Model Dakota Vectra
Year Released 2000 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4699 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 173 HP
Torque 576 Nm 265 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4980 mm 4830 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1670 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 2840 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]