2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1968 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,599 cc, 1968 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Toyota Crown (98 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Toyota Crown should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Because 1968 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Toyota Crown (201 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Neon. (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1968 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 1968 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Neon | Crown |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1687 cc | 2599 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2750 mm |