2000 Ford Artic vs. 2004 Toyota Hilux
To start off, 2004 Toyota Hilux is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Hilux (210 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Hilux should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Artic weights approximately 358 kg more than 2004 Toyota Hilux.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Hilux (441 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Artic. (325 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Hilux will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Artic. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 2004 Toyota Hilux has manual transmission. 2004 Toyota Hilux will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Artic | 2004 Toyota Hilux | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Artic | Hilux |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3998 cc | 2786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 940 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 87 L |
