2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1977 TVR M
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 TVR M would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 308 kg more than 1977 TVR M.
Because 1977 TVR M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 TVR M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 1977 TVR M has manual transmission. 1977 TVR M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 1977 TVR M | |
| Make | Ford | TVR |
| Model | e-Ka | M |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 900 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2290 mm |
