2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1982 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 1,988 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 132 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Because 1982 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 1982 Mercedes-Benz E has manual transmission. 1982 Mercedes-Benz E will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford e-Ka | 1982 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | e-Ka | E |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1340 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2800 mm |