2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1990 Mercury Tracer
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 1,859 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mercury Tracer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1990 Mercury Tracer. (88 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 1990 Mercury Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 158 kg more than 1990 Mercury Tracer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Mercury Tracer. (146 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Mercury Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 1990 Mercury Tracer | |
| Make | Ford | Mercury |
| Model | e-Ka | Tracer |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1859 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 88 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1050 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2510 mm |
