2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 1996 Kia Avella
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Kia Avella. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Kia Avella would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1996 Kia Avella. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Avella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 293 kg more than 1996 Kia Avella. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Avella. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Avella.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford e-Ka | 1996 Kia Avella | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | e-Ka | Avella |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 915 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2400 mm |
