2000 Ford e-Ka vs. 2005 Kia Picanto
To start off, 2005 Kia Picanto is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2005 Kia Picanto. (64 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Picanto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 358 kg more than 2005 Kia Picanto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Picanto. (96 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Picanto.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford e-Ka | 2005 Kia Picanto | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | e-Ka | Picanto |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1084 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 96 Nm |
Top Speed | 154 km/hour | 154 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 850 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2380 mm |