2000 Ford Equator vs. 1951 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Jaguar C-Type (200 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 243 kg more than 1951 Jaguar C-Type.
Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jaguar C-Type (298 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1951 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1951 Jaguar C-Type has manual transmission. 1951 Jaguar C-Type will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 1951 Jaguar C-Type | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Equator | C-Type |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 3442 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 965 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2440 mm |
