2000 Ford Equator vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML (288 HP @ 2700 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 932 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML (440 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Equator | 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Equator | ML |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1787 cc | 4966 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 288 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 2140 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2920 mm |
