2000 Ford Equator vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 507 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (244 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Equator | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Equator | Ranger |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1787 cc | 2983 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 244 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1715 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2840 mm |