2000 Ford Falcon vs. 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. (104 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 503 kg more than 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Falcon | 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Falcon | Dove GTR4 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 2138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 53 L |
