2000 Ford Puma vs. 1965 Mazda Familia
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 1,387 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1965 Mazda Familia. (57 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1965 Mazda Familia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 218 kg more than 1965 Mazda Familia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (125 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mazda Familia. (81 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mazda Familia.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1965 Mazda Familia | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Puma | Familia |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1387 cc | 985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 792 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2200 mm |