2000 Ford Puma vs. 1974 Seat 131

To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Seat 131 would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1974 Seat 131. (64 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1974 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 310 kg more than 1974 Seat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1974 Seat 131 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Seat 131. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Seat 131. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Seat 131.

Compare all specifications: