2000 Ford Puma vs. 1974 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,387 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1974 Suzuki Fronte. (33 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1974 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 465 kg more than 1974 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (125 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Suzuki Fronte. (43 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Puma | 1974 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Puma | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
| Engine Size | 1387 cc | 356 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 43 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 545 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2040 mm |
