2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1987 Zastava 750
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1987 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1987 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 658 kg more than 1987 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Zastava 750. (56 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 1987 Zastava 750 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Ranger | 750 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1987 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 56 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2010 mm |