2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1996 Honda Civic

To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Honda Civic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Honda Civic would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1996 Honda Civic. (127 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1996 Honda Civic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 88 kg more than 1996 Honda Civic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Honda Civic. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Honda Civic.

Compare all specifications: