2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 1962 Simca Plein Ceil
To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Simca Plein Ceil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Simca Plein Ceil would be higher. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TL-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1962 Simca Plein Ceil. (56 HP @ 200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TL-50 should accelerate faster than 1962 Simca Plein Ceil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TL-50 weights approximately 202 kg more than 1962 Simca Plein Ceil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford TL-50 has automatic transmission and 1962 Simca Plein Ceil has manual transmission. 1962 Simca Plein Ceil will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TL-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TL-50 | 1962 Simca Plein Ceil | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | TL-50 | Plein Ceil |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2360 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 42 L |
