2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TL-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (123 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TL-50 should accelerate faster than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 18 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50.
Because 2000 Ford TL-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TL-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 367 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (203 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TL-50 | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | TL-50 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1320 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2680 mm |
