2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 183 kg more than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | TS-50 | Celica |
Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1025 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2510 mm |