2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 438 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TS-50 (175 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TS-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | TS-50 | 102 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 770 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2160 mm |
