2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1984 Plymouth Caravelle

To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Plymouth Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Plymouth Caravelle weights approximately 27 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle (228 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1984 Plymouth Caravelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.

Compare all specifications: