2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2005 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2005 Nissan Murano is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Murano (246 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Murano weights approximately 587 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TS-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Murano (334 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 2005 Nissan Murano | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | TS-50 | Murano |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 246 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 334 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1795 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 82 L |
