2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2009 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2009 Toyota Highlander is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 3,456 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Highlander (270 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Highlander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Highlander (336 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2009 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 2009 Toyota Highlander | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | TS-50 | Highlander |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3456 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 336 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 73 L |
