2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2012 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2012 GMC Yukon is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 GMC Yukon (332 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1458 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 GMC Yukon (497 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2012 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2012 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | TS-50 | Yukon |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 332 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 497 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 2666 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 95 L |