2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden GTS-R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden GTS-R would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden GTS-R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Land Rover Range Rover. (441 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Land Rover Range Rover. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden GTS-R has manual transmission. 2000 Holden GTS-R will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden GTS-R | 2006 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Holden | Land Rover |
| Model | GTS-R | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
| Torque | 644 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
