2000 Holden HRT vs. 1965 Jensen CV-8
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jensen CV-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jensen CV-8 would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Jensen CV-8 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Jensen CV-8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Jensen CV-8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Jensen CV-8. (576 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Jensen CV-8. 1965 Jensen CV-8 has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1965 Jensen CV-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1965 Jensen CV-8 | |
| Make | Holden | Jensen |
| Model | HRT | CV-8 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 6286 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 330 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 576 Nm |
| Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 208 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
