2000 Holden HRT vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 632 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (183 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | HRT | 3 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
