2000 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 349 more horse power than 2004 Mercedes-Benz S. (494 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercedes-Benz S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 870 kg more than 2000 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercedes-Benz S. (700 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2000 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercedes-Benz S.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotec C 1000 | 2004 Mercedes-Benz S | |
| Make | Lotec | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | C 1000 | S |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5500 cc | 5441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 843 HP | 494 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 990 Nm | 700 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 5170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1460 mm |
