2000 Mazda 626 vs. 1978 Mazda 929
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mazda 626 (100 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 626 weights approximately 316 kg more than 1978 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mazda 626 (392 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mazda 626 | 1978 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 626 | 929 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 392 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 88 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 55 L |