2000 Mitsubishi SSU vs. 2008 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2008 Renault Scenic is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Renault Scenic (161 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 429 kg more than 2008 Renault Scenic.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Renault Scenic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Scenic (270 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 2008 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | 2008 Renault Scenic | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | SSU | Scenic |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1476 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 60 L |
