2000 Mitsubishi SSU vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mitsubishi SSU | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | SSU | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2490 mm |