2000 Proton 400 vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2000 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Proton 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A6 (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Proton 400 | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Proton | Audi |
Model | 400 | A6 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2911 mm |