2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2002 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2002 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 SsangYong Rexton (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 951 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 SsangYong Rexton. (256 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 SsangYong Rexton.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 2002 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | Audi | SsangYong |
| Model | AL2 | Rexton |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 256 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1851 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2830 mm |
