2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2009 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2009 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota 4Runner (260 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 180 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota 4Runner (415 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 2009 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 2009 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | AL2 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 4664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 415 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1080 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2800 mm |