2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC60 (281 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 993 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo XC60 (400 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Audi | Volvo |
| Model | AL2 | XC60 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 281 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1893 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2774 mm |
