2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. (282 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 900 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z22. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z22 | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | BMW | Land Rover |
| Model | Z22 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 4396 cc |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 2515 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 100 L |
