2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 2000 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2001 Cadillac LMP is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2000 Oldsmobile SS. (202 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 2000 Oldsmobile SS.
Because 2001 Cadillac LMP is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Cadillac LMP. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Oldsmobile SS. (318 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Oldsmobile SS.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Cadillac LMP | 2000 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
Model | LMP | SS |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 401 Nm | 318 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |