2001 Chevrolet Celta vs. 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Celta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Celta would be higher.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Celta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Celta | 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Celta | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 78 L |