2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1966 Citroen Ami
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1966 Citroen Ami | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
| Model | Tracker | Ami |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1966 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 602 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2410 mm |
