2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 1978 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 2001 Daewoo Vada is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,963 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Daewoo Vada (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1978 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Daewoo Vada weights approximately 463 kg more than 1978 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Daewoo Vada (144 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm). This means 2001 Daewoo Vada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 1978 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | Vada | RX-3 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1963 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 135 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 850 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2320 mm |