2001 Ford Econoline vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1155 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econoline | 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Econoline | Dingo |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2450 mm |