2001 Ford F-650 vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2001 Ford F-650 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 7,300 cc, 2001 Ford F-650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2001 Ford F-650. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford F-650. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford F-650 weights approximately 3 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford F-650, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford F-650 (1,166 Nm) has 876 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 2001 Ford F-650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford F-650 | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | F-650 | XK |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7300 cc | 3441 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 1166 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1295 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 4930 mm | 2600 mm |
