2001 Holden HSV vs. 1960 Hudson Metropolitan
To start off, 2001 Holden HSV is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 592 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. (100 Nm). This means 2001 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Holden HSV | 1960 Hudson Metropolitan | |
Make | Holden | Hudson |
Model | HSV | Metropolitan |
Year Released | 2001 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5698 cc | 1487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 47 HP |
Torque | 692 Nm | 100 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |