2001 Lada Roadster vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lada Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lada Roadster would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS (264 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 2001 Lada Roadster. (76 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 2001 Lada Roadster.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lada Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS (620 Nm) has 504 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lada Roadster. (116 Nm). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lada Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lada Roadster | 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
| Make | Lada | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Roadster | CLS |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 2987 cc |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 264 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 620 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2875 mm |
