2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK (350 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lancia Nea | 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
| Make | Lancia | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Nea | CLK |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2445 cc | 3498 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 314 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2720 mm |
