2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2009 Lincoln MKX
To start off, 2009 Lincoln MKX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lincoln MKX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lincoln MKX (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln MKX should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lincoln MKX weights approximately 502 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Lincoln MKX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lancia Nea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln MKX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lincoln MKX (339 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2009 Lincoln MKX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 2009 Lincoln MKX | |
Make | Lancia | Lincoln |
Model | Nea | MKX |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 3496 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1872 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2830 mm |