2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2009 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Armada weights approximately 72 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lancia Nea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 2009 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Lancia | Nissan |
Model | Nea | Armada |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 5551 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 522 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1442 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 3140 mm |